The Kennedys and the Gores
President, Historical Association
In a country that prides itself on its egalitarianism and its democracy, it is perhaps surprising that family dynasties are so prominent in its national politics – the Kennedys, the Bushes, the Clintons. Albert Gore Sr was a prominent senator in the 1950s and 1960s. His son was in due course elected to the Senate as well, then to the vice-presidency, and finally was the unsuccessful Democratic candidate for the presidency in 2000. Gore Sr was elected to the Senate at the same time as JFK and their families were friends. Their close political friendship survived Gore wrecking JFK’s chances of winning the vice-presidential party nomination in 1956. Gore’s remorseless opposition to the Kennedy tax cut also led to the President describing him as a son of a bitch. Gore and Bobby Kennedy were allied on both social spending programmes and the the Vietnam War. When RFK was assassinated, Gore hoped that Ted Kennedy would run for the presidency in 1968. At great political cost he supported Ted Kennedy’s drive to oppose Nixon’s southern nominations to the Supreme Court. Gore’s son and Ted Kennedy served in the Senate together and both had presidential ambitions. In the 1980s both had different visions of how the national Democrats could win. Those differences continued into the Clinton presidency and the 2000 election.
The lecture examines these friendships and tensions over 50 years to illustrate the changing nature and fortunes of the Democratic Party.
Education keynote speech
Inspecting the history curriculum under the new inspection framework (EIF) 2019
Inspector Curriculum and Professional Development Lead, Ofsted
This session will aim to explain Ofsted’s approach to inspecting the curriculum under the new education inspection framework (EIF) that will come into effect in September 2019, with special reference to the history curriculum.
Friday keynote speech
The Raj at war: a people’s history of India’s Second World War
Associate Professor of British History, University of Oxford
Indian soldiers stand at the centre of the Second World War. They fought at all the major battles, spanning the war’s theatres from Monte Casino to Kohima. There were Indian regiments fighting in the deserts of North and East Africa. Indian regiments served around the Mediterranean, in Italy and in Greece, and they rolled into Rome as it was recaptured. Along the South-East Asian theatre they were the backbone of the troops at every grisly battle for Burma. There were Indians evacuated at Dunkirk and Indian fighter pilots flying deadly sorties in the RAF during the Battle of Britain. We know more about these two million soldiers than ever before.
But what about South Asians at home and the experiences of ordinary people beyond the battlefield? Can we talk of something like India’s Home Front? Did India experience ‘total war’ with all its social, economic and moral implications? This part of India’s war is a strangely obscure story. How did the global war – which was wrenching apart societies across the world – shape India’s own development during the 1940s? How far did Indian society itself feel the full force of the world’s war?
Told through the life-stories of individuals – soldiers, civilians, men and women – this lecture will restore the centrality of India to the war.
Saturday keynote speech
We are delighted to announce cultural historian Fern Riddell will be opening on Saturday morning. Fern has written and presented on Victorian and Edwardian cultural history and her books have explored Victorian attitudes to sex and the more radical elements of the Suffragist movement. More information will be published shortly.